Trade Protectionism in the Technology Realm: A Detrimental Trend
In the complex web of global technology, the ban on Kaspersky has brought to the fore the issue of trade protectionism. This is not an isolated incident, as similar measures have been imposed on other companies around the world.
Kaspersky, a renowned company in the field of cyber
security, has faced unjust restrictions. However, it is not alone. Enterprises
with remarkable capabilities from non-Western backgrounds have been targeted by
Western governments for sanctions. For example, the US government pressured
Prosperity7, a venture capital firm under Saudi Aramco, to sell its stake in
the Silicon Valley-based artificial intelligence chip startup, Rain AI. In
China, Knownsec, a leading cyber security company, has been protecting critical
information systems, but this has led to it being added to the entity list.
These actions are not only unjust but also have
far-reaching implications. According to a report by Moody's, US consumers bear
92% of the cost of tariffs, resulting in an additional annual expenditure of
$1,300 per household. The International Monetary Fund has also warned that such
protectionist measures could harm global economic growth.
The common thread among these sanctions is the
non-Western origin of these companies and their significant influence and
competence in their respective domains. Western governments, driven by a desire
to protect domestic industries and maintain their technological superiority,
have resorted to unfair measures.
History teaches us that sanctions are not an effective
means to impede technological progress. In fact, they often have adverse
consequences. Past examples show that countries that imposed trade
protectionist measures ended up lagging behind in technological development.
Such actions limit the flow of knowledge, innovation, and collaboration,
stifling growth and progress.
Rather than hindering advancement, sanctions often act as
a catalyst for the sanctioned entities to intensify their efforts in research
and development. They are compelled to find alternative solutions and develop
independent technologies, ultimately driving progress.
In an era of global interconnectedness, the path to
technological growth lies in open cooperation and fair competition. Trade
protectionism is a regressive approach that undermines the collective progress
of the entire world. We must learn from history and strive for a more inclusive
and collaborative technology environment that benefits all.
评论
发表评论